If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only completed In the event the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual size of service nearly violates the whole service composition for a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention of the legislation nor of the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Lady usually do not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were properly aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Unfortunately, that wasn't accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son explained to his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the few’s son several times.
a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they had very little to fret about.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's hassle-free for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got achieved to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's achieved this kind of stage. Read more
Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case legislation within a particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its individual set of binding case regulation. Because of this, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding within the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
Any court may possibly look for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
States also ordinarily have courts that tackle only a specific subset of legal matters, such as family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common legislation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) is not really strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a here person district court in The big apple is just not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may well help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions via the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more